The resons behind the decision to set up a database are mainly the following:
The structure of an archive needs to be planned very carefully, and the planning stage is a very sensitive and decisive one. It is important to focus on what information is important in the context in which the archive is being set up. In otehr words, among all the attributes of the subjects to be archived, it is necessary to select only those considered useful for the operations (research, selection., elaboration, etc.) intended.
In our case, since the archive is aimed at providing a census of the European institutions involved in distance learning, sampling for research and organising the distribition of the questionnaire on testing strategies, planning the single entries followed the following criteria:
| contents of field | name of field | type | Length |
| Number of identification | num | number | 4 |
| type | tipo | letter | 3 |
| name of institution | Ist1 | letter | 100 |
| name of institution | Ist2 | letter | 35 |
| postal address | ind | letter | 35 |
| country acronym | nazsig | letter | 3 |
| postcode | cap | letter | 32 |
| name country | naz | letter | 30 |
| contact name | cog | letter | 20 |
| contact name | nom | letter | 20 |
| telephone number | tel1 | letter | 20 |
| telephone number | tel2 | letter | 20 |
| fax number | fax | letter | 20 |
| electronic mail | letter | 40 | |
| www address | www | letter | 40 |
| send questionnaire | quest | logic | 1 |
Our first source of information was the CRIAD archive from which we extracted the names of various experts involved in distance teaching in various European countries with whom collaboration exchanges were already underway. These experts were the people to whom we sent the preliminary informative questionnaire(1) that aimed to gather information on distance learning in each and every EU country. Only six countries sent back their questionnaires and not even all of these were complete. Greece provided us with a detailed list of distance learning centres operating there, giving us precious information on an rea we knew very little about.
Another important source of information was the FUKUR archive set up in the ambit of the same research project by a group at the FernUniversität. Since the archive had been set up with the same programme as ours (DB5), we were able to download directly the fields that interested us after adapting the structure.
Finally, the International Centre for Distance Education, provided us with a list of institutions which would provide us with further information and data.
It is important to note that the sources of information we have mentioned, most of which were set up with different aims than ours', rarely provided us with all the data we needed to fill in our archive. In the vast majority of cases it was necessary to contact the institution directly to complete or correct the information. In many cases it was impossible to establish contact with the institutions involved and other means were adopted, such as asking for help from the experts or contacting the embassies in the various countries.
At the end of this work of control and completion, 819 institutions were included in our archive. Among these, we were only able to verify the wxactiness of the information for ... institutions. In the appendices it is possible to consult the lists of the institutes controlled, organised according to type of institute (DPU = Distance Teaching University, ULDE = University-Level Distance Education, GDTP = Government Distance Training Provision, PDTP = Propriety Distance Training Provision).
This first archive will become part of a system of correlated
archives, a real database of all the data regarding evaluation systems
in distance teaching institutions in Europe.