Fakultät Logo logo logo

Projekt

Illustration

International Regimes Database

Projektleitung:
Status: laufend
Laufzeit: 1994 - 2004

Kurzbeschreibung:

The International Regimes Database (IRD) is a tool designed by a German-American research-team in collaboration with 46 case-study experts who coded 23 international environmental regimes. The database is available on a CD-Rom added to a book by Helmut Breitmeier, Oran R. Young, and Michael Zürn published with The MIT Press in 2006. Another book by Helmut Breitmeier on "The Legitimacy of International Regimes: Findings from The International Regimes Database" has been published in 2008 with Ashgate (Aldershot).

Publikationen

  • Breitmeier, Helmut/Underdal, Arild/Young, Oran R. 2011: The Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes: Comparing and Contrasting Findings from Quantitative Research, in: International Studies Review 13: 4, 579-605.
  • Helmut Breitmeier 2006: Die output-orientierte Legitimität des globalen Regierens: Empirische Befunde aus der quantitativen Erforschung internationaler Umweltregime, in Zeitschrift für internationale Beziehungen 13:1 (2006).
  • Helmut Breitmeier/Oran R. Young/Michael Zürn 2006: Analyzing International Environmental Regimes: From Case Study to Database. Cambridge, The MIT Press (Cambridge, Mass.).
  • Helmut Breitmeier 2006: Institutions, Knowledge and Change: Findings from the Quantitative Study of Environmental Regimes, in: Gerd Winter (ed.): Multilevel Governance of Global Environmental Change. Cambridge 2006, p. 430-452.
  • Helmut Breitmeier 2008: The Legitimacy of International Regimes: Findings from the International Regimes Database, Ashgate (Aldershot), 2008.
  • Helmut Breitmeier, Oran R. Young and Michael Zürn (in preparation): The International Regimes Database: Architecture and Key Findings, Paper Presented for the Workshop “Politics and the Environment” Held at the Otto-Suhr-Institute for Political Science in Berlin, 4 December 2005.
  • Helmut Breitmeier 2005: Die Legitimität internationaler Regime: Empirische Befunde aus der quantitativen Erforschung internationaler Umweltregime, Papier zur Tagung der IB-Sektion der Deutschen Vereinigung für Politische Wissenschaft (DVPW) vom 6./7. Oktober 2005 in Mannheim
  • Helmut Breitmeier 2004: International Regimes and Democracy. Consequences on Domestic and Transnational Level, in: Oran R. Young/Arild Underdal (Hrsg.): Regime Consequences. Methodological Challenges and Research Strategies Dordrecht (Kluwer Academic Publishers) S. 281-306.
  • Helmut Breitmeier (unveröffentlichtes Konferenzpapier) 2002: The Legitimacy of International Regimes: NGOs and the Demands for Effectiveness and Participation, Paper presented at the 43rd Annual International Studies Aassociation, 24-27 March 2002, New Orleans.
  • Helmut Breitmeier/Marc Levy/Oran R. Young/Michael Zürn 1996: IIASA International Regimes Database - Data Protocol, IIASA-Working Paper WP-96-154, Laxenburg -
  • Helmut Breitmeier/Marc Levy/Oran R. Young/Michael Zürn 1996: The International Regimes Database as a Tool for the Study of International Cooperation, IIASA Working Paper WP-96-160, Laxenburg.

Projektbeschreibung

The International Regimes Database (IRD) is a tool designed by a German-American research-team in collaboration with 46 case-study experts who coded 23 international environmental regimes. The database is available on a CD-Rom added to a book by Helmut Breitmeier, Oran R. Young, and Michael Zürn published with The MIT Press in 2006. Another book by Helmut Breitmeier on "The Legitimacy of International Regimes: Findings from The International Regimes Database" has been published in 2008 with Ashgate (Aldershot).

The IRD includes data about various aspects related to the formation, attributes, consequences and dynamics of regimes. The coding of regimes has been carried out on the basis of a comprehensive data-protocol. The different sections of the codebook consider a large number of theoretical concepts that emerged in the context of regime analysis. The codebook consists of 136 questions which were developed for the measurement of variables belonging to these approaches.
The database combines data on 23 environmental regimes that were established in global, multilateral, regional and bilateral contexts. The broad majority of these regimes were coded by two experts independently of one another so that an assessment could be made in regard to whether coders using the same coding instrument come to equivalent results regarding the coding of single variables for a regime. These experts qualified for the coding because they were well-known in the scientific community for their knowledge on these regimes. The coding of these experts is based on the empirical knowledge they gained from many years of case-study research. The selection of coders was based on a rule of thumb that only experts who are well-known for their knowledge on specific regimes should be involved with the coding.

The regimes have been coded from their formation to the year 1998 as a common end-point of analysis. This common end-point allows the exploration of various aspects related to the performance of these regimes by the end of the twentieth century. Regimes were subdivided into several components that reflect legal-institutional complexity of governance systems. The development of the case structures used for the coding took place in so-called ‘pre-coding negotiations’. These negotiations were carried out between the project team and regime experts.

The coding did not focus on the macro-level of a regime but took into account the existence of different legal and institutional forms which make up a regime as a whole. For example, the Antarctic regime has been subdivided into components such as the Antarctic Treaty, the Convention on the Conservation of Flora and Fauna, the Convention on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources, the Convention on the Conservation of Seals, or the Protocol on Environmental Protect-ion. This distinction between institutional forms allows to determine whether the level of consensual knowledge varies for different issues in a regime (e.g., the conservation of seals, conservation of flora and fauna).

Regimes

Antarctic Regime 1959-1998 Antarctic Treaty (1959-1980) (1980s) (1989/91-1998) • Conservation of Flora and Fauna (1964-1980) (1980s) (1989/91-1998) • Conservation of Seals (1972-1980) (1980s) (1989/91-1998) • CCAMLR (1980s) (1989/91-1998) • Protocol on Environ¬men¬tal Protection (1989/91-1998)
Baltic Sea Regime 1974- 1998 Principles of Co-operation (1974-1992) (1992-1998) • Environment Protection Principles (1974-1992) (1992-1998) • Regulations for all Sources of Marine Pollution (1974-1992) (1992-1998) • Nature Conservation (1992-1998)
Barents Sea Fisheries Regime 1975-1998 Norwegian-Russian Cooperation on Fisheries in the Barents Sea Region (1975-1998)
Biodiversity Regime 1992-1998 Convention on Biological Diversity (1992-1998)
CITES-Regime (Trade in Endangered Species) 1973-1998 CITES-Convention (1973-1989) (1989-1998) • TRAFFIC-Network on Monitoring and Compliance (1978-1989) (1989-1998)
Climate Change Regime 1992-1998 United Natoins Framework Convention on Climate Change [UNFCCC] (1992-1997) (1997-1998) • UNFCCC Financial Mechanism (1992-1997) (1997-1998) • Kyoto-Protocol (1997-1998)
Danube River Protection Regime 1985-1998 Danube River Protection (1985-1991) (1991-1994) (1994-1998)
Desertification Regime 1994-1998 United Nations Convention to Combat Desertificattion [UNCCD] (1994-1998)
Great Lakes Management Regime 1972-1998 Great Lakes Water Quality (1972-1978) (1978-1998) • Great Lakes Water Quantity (1972-178) (1978-1998) • Great Lakes Ecosystem Management (1978-1998)
Hazardous Waste Regime 1989-1998 Basel Convention (1989-1995) (1995-1998) • Amendment to the Basel Convention (1995-1998) • OECD/EU/Lome IV-Regulations (1989-1995) (1995-1998) • Bamako Convention (1991-1995) • Bamako/Waigani Conventions (1995-1998)
IATTC Regime (Interamerican Tropical Tuna Convention) 1949-1998 Conservation and Management of Tunas and Tuna-Like Fishes (1949-1976) (1976-1998) • Conservation and Management of Dolphins (1976-1998)
ICCAT Regime (Conservation of Atlantic Tunas) 1966-1998 ICCAT-Convention (1966-1998)
Regime for the International Regulation of Whaling 1948-1998 Whaling Regime (1946-1982) (1982-1998)
London Convention Regime 1972-1998 Wastes and Substances the Dumping of which is Prohibited (1972-1991) (1991-1998) • Wastes and Substances which, in Principle, may be Dumped (1972-1991) (1991-1998) • Regulation of Incineration at Sea (1978-1991) (1991-1998)
ECE-Regime on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution (LRTAP) 1979-1998 LRTAP-Convention (1979-1982) (1982-1998) • First Sulphur Protocol (1985-1998) • Nox-Protocol (1988-1998) • VOCs-Protocol (1991-1998) • Second Sulphur-Protocol (1994-1998)
North Sea Regime 1972/74-1998 OSCOM/PARCOM (1972/74-1984) • OSCOM/PARCOM/OSPAR (1984/92-1998) • North Sea Conferences (1984-1998)
Oil Pollution Regime 1954-1998 Oilpol (1954-1978) • MARPOL (1973/78-1998) • Regional Memoranda of Understanding (1982-1998)
Regime for Protection of the Rhine Against Pollution 1963-1998 Berne Convention (1963-1998) • Chloride Pollution Convention (1976-1998) • Chemical Pollution Convention (1976-1998)
Ramsar Regime on Wetlands 1971-1998 Ramsar Convention (1971-1987) (1987-1998)
Regime for Protection of the Black Sea 1992-1998 Bucharest Convention and Protocols (1992-1998) • Black Sea Strategic Action Plan (1996-1998)
South Pacific Fisheries Forum Agency Regime 1979-1998 General Management of Fisheries (1979-1982) (1982-1995/97) (1995/97-1998) • Compliance of Fisheries Management (1979-1982) (1982-1995/97) (1995/97-1998)
Stratospheric Ozone Regime 1985-1998 Vienna Convention (1985-1990) (1990-1998) • Montreal Protocol (1987-1990) 1990-1998) • London Amendment (1990-1998) • Copenhagen Amendment (1992-1998) • Multilateral Fund (1990-1998)
Tropical Timber Trade Regime 1983-1998 International Tropical Timber Agreement (1983-1998)

Toscana

One way to analyze correlation between variables included in the IRD is the use of a TOSCANA-system which has been developed by the research team in collaboration with Prof. Rudolf Wille and Tim Kaiser from the Department of Mathematics at Darmstadt University of Technology. The idea of a TOSCANA-system is a result of long experience in data analysis using concept lattices for deeper understanding and proper communication of data. The usage of conceptual scaling combined with computational support yields a powerful analysis tool. The software links the scales from the conceptual file to the database enabling thereby the user of the system to explore the conceptual structure of the data by displaying line diagrams of concept lattices of pieces of the data.

03.02.2012
FernUni-Logo FernUniversität in Hagen, Fakultät KSW, Institut für Politikwissenschaft, 58084 Hagen